«

»

Jul
23

Penn State, Batman, and Backlash as the American Method of Discourse

Quote of the Day:

“Of all the properties which belong to honorable men, not one is so highly prized as that of character.”     –Henry Clay

Where do I start? Like TB, you all know more details than you wish you could imagine about the child sex predator scandal at Penn State and the mass murder last week at the Batman opening in Denver.

Today it was announced that Penn State would be penalized by the NCAA. Every win from 1998 through 2011 was vacated, a 60 million dollar fine, five years probation, four year bowl ban and ten scholarships per year for four years. It is a staggering blow to the school and it’s fan base, virtually none of whom deserve to suffer. That’s why, I guess, the backlash has already started. “Penn State got no due process!” “The NCAA exceeded it’s authority!” “The NCAA is grandstanding!” And on the other side, “they should have gotten the death penalty!”

As for the Batman massacre, our societal response in the so-called mainstream universe has been nothing more than a regurgitation of the “dialogue” we had after Columbine. And Virginia Tech. And Fort Hood. And Pearl. And the other three dozen or so shooting sprees over the last few decades in America. “Now do you right-wingers see why we want gun-control?!” “Now do you lefties see why everyone should pack heat?!” “Let’s start a pistol buy-back program!” “It’s perfectly reasonable for a postman to own a machine gun and 20,000 rounds of armor piercing ammunition!”

Enough!

Americans are seemingly incapable of thoughtful discourse. We see crisis as our only avenue to action, the manipulation of our national emotional condition. Here’s the thing. These incidents are outliers. On the other hand, they are also the product of something bigger; they are the out of proportion results of obvious flaws in our culture. We place too much emphasis on sports. We give too much power to too few people, for the wrong reasons. We lash out recklessly to avenge crime. We have a gun and violence problem–the worst in the civilized world. We have a clear majority that believes strongly in responsible gun ownership. We are imperfect. And we steadfastly refuse to seek workable solutions.

Penn State deserves its punishment. Their leadership has acknowledged this even if their alumni cannot. They have to suffer because it is the best and only, if inefficient, way of spurring not only Penn State but all of organized sports to institute safeguards and controls to reduce the incidence of child abuse under their watch and to deter future cover-ups of criminal activity at the official level.

As for guns, we are a democracy. Our democracy long ago settled the question of gun ownership and availability. Liberals have to understand that. The issue now is how to lessen gun violence; that’s something we ought to be able to agree on. And forgive the pun, but there is obviously no silver-bullet answer. The right to bear arms, just like other rights guaranteed in the Constitution, is not and should not be absolute. There is a line. Right wingers have to accept that.  And beyond simply dealing with the instruments of death, we have to deal with the people who use them. Is nightly televised violence playing a role? Video games? Mental illness? Poverty? Declining morals? Something else? I read on twitter last night, “Guns don’t kill people. Americans kill people.” So true.

Wouldn’t it be nice if we could step back from the backlash? Realize there is a problem? Agree on what the problems are? And set aside personal interest and politics in an attempt to address them?

It would be nice, I think.

 

Permanent link to this article: http://www.missingtheground.com/2012/07/penn-state-batman-and-backlash-as-the-american-method-of-discourse/

  • nelson

    Shared hatred toward the NCAA = good. I guess the rules pertaining to lack of institutional control are pretty broad, non-specific, and can be levied pretty easily. Obviously the institution lacked control, and in fact, created havoc. I’m just having a hard time connecting the dots between the crimes that were committed and then covered up and how that related to a competitive advantage for the football program.

    July 25 2012
    CommentsLike
    • TDW

      “[I]t became obvious that the leadership failures at Penn State over an extended period of time directly violated Association bylaws and the NCAA Constitution relating to control over the athletic department, integrity and ethical conduct.”

      I’m no fan of the NCAA — in fact, I think the NCAA is evil and perpetuates a great injustice — but it’s hard for me to believe some of those boosters didn’t know. To me, PSU exemplifies “lack of institutional control.” But I do hate the NCAA.

      TB, my phone auto entered “B.” I’ll remain TDW though I’m seldom witty these days.

      July 24 2012
      CommentsLike
      • nelson

        To steal a phrase from Mac, I think the NCAA is batshit crazy, as it relates to Penn State/JoePa/Sandusky.

        I think they have more than over-reached on this. The punishment itself, is ridiculous. But that’s not what is upsetting. It’s the fact that they have the power to hand such punishment in a case where there was apparrently no NCAA violation.

        Don’t get me wrong here, what Sandusky did, and subsequently what JoePa and other adminstrators did, is horrendous, and they should be punished justly. By the criminal justice system. And I think they will (except for JoePa cause he’s dead).

        Out of all of the things I’ve read or watched regarding this situation, I’ve yet to see anything that constitutes an NCAA violation.

        The power that the NCAA displays during normal NCAA investigations and punishments is already out of balance. The fact that the NCAA apparently now has the power to issue penalties where no violation has occurred is extremely disturbing.

        July 24 2012
        CommentsLike
        • Travellinbaen

          Yep.

          But you’re not so disillusioned that you gave up your moniker???? Right???

          July 24 2012
          CommentsLike
          • B (fka TDW)

            Look up the George Washington quote containing his admonition against political parties. We’ve done exactly what he said we shouldn’t do. I used to be optimistic about our political future. Then I quit being optimistic and said I was hopeful. Now I’m neither optimistic nor hopeful. I think the corporate take over is complete. The oligarchy is entrenched like no time since the early 20th century and we have no Teddy Roosevelt to stand up to them. Obama will continue to say “liberal” things and do conservative ones, if any at all. And the right will continue to move right and deny that they no longer resemble themselves.

            It’s all about party now, at least on the surface. Behind the scenes, at the levers of power, they don’t really care. They only let the government operate within a narrow margin anyway.

            July 24 2012
            CommentsLike
            • Fish

              People are just F’n dumb! Here is a link with more morons!
              http://news.yahoo.com/3-arrested-separate-dark-knight-incidents-080930278.html

              July 24 2012
              CommentsLike
              • Smilyj

                I’m a gun owner. Not an assault weapon owner but I believe in the right t own a gun. Not oplowed to some limits but not sure how they’d help. Drugs are illegal, people get drugs. I do find it odd that if you take flight lessons, the Feds get a heads up. If you go on a spree of buying assault weapons, body armor, thousands of rounds of ammo, and explosives, no one is compelled to report that to the Feds! I’ve com to the conclusion that the US is just different. Don’t know why. Not always for the better obviously.

                July 23 2012
                CommentsLike
                • Travellinbaen

                  Ah, thanks for the clarification. I thought I was arguing a pretty non-pigeonholed pov! Tried to anyway.

                  July 23 2012
                  CommentsLike
                  • Mac

                    Just for clarification, “We” meant all people. Not you and me. I hope Benjie will comment on this. Interesting view to say the least.

                    July 23 2012
                    CommentsLike
                    • Travellinbaen

                      Thanks.

                      As for disagreeing, I am sure you and I would not agree where the line should be drawn if the issue is restricting access to weapons. But surely there is some line? Bazookas? Tanks? Seriously, the line may be far apart, but I am assuming not many people would think private citizens should own tanks. If so, they have a line and we maybe could negotiate a middle point.

                      As far as my opinion on the matter, what I was really trying to get across was that one incident, even a horrific one, should not drive policy one way or cause the opposition to dig in it’s heels. The problems we have are much bigger than Happy Valley and Aurora and the solutions–or perhaps just realistic efforts at solutions–in my opinion, are much more complex than simply slapping sanctions on a school or arguing a settled issue like gun ownership. Truth is, a nut like the guy in CO will find a way to kill once he makes up his mind. The real question to me is, why are there so many more nuts (with access to killing devices) in America than in most of the rest of the world?

                      July 23 2012
                      CommentsLike


                      %d bloggers like this: